Prince Harry loses case against UK govt over personal security cover downgrade

Edited By: Shomini Sen
New Delhi Updated: Feb 28, 2024, 08:11 PM(IST)

Last month Netflix released a docuseries titled “Harry & Meghan" which has brought a lot of heat towards the Duke of Sussex Photograph:( Reuters )

Story highlights

Harry launched legal action against the government after being told in February 2020 that he would no longer be given the "same degree" of publicly-funded protection when in Britain.

Prince Harry lost a court challenge against the UK government on Wednesday over a decision to change the level of his personal security when he visits the country.

Harry launched legal action against the government after being told in February 2020 that he would no longer be given the "same degree" of publicly-funded protection when in Britain.

"The 'bespoke' process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound," High Court judge Peter Lane said in his 52-page judgment. 

Much of the legal proceedings, which covered security arrangements for senior figures, were held in private in December 2023, reports the BBC. The ruling was issued by retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane on Wednesday morning. Prince Harry, Meghan Markle slammed for using royal titles on new website

The ruling is likely to impact Harry's future visits to the UK, as he previously argued that the lower level of security has made it difficult to bring his family to the country.

The news comes amid Harry's father, King Charles III's cancer treatment. Earlier this month, as the King was diagnosed with cancer, Harry rushed to the UK to meet his father and stayed in the country for a day before heading back to his family. Rumours are rife that Harry may now visit the UK with his wife and children soon to meet the monarch. 

Also read: Prince Harry to visit UK with Lilibet and Archie amid King Charles’ cancer diagnosis: Report

In the ruling, Sir Peter rejected the Duke's case, finding that there had not been any unlawfulness in deciding to downgrade Prince Harry's security status and that any departure from policy was justified.

(With agency inputs)

Read in App